LearnSkillOpen the interactive chapter

Physics · Build the model before choosing an equation

Rigid bodies: one translation, one rotation

A cricket ball can travel toward a batter while spinning. A door can turn without its hinge moving. A rolling wheel does both. These are not three separate branches of mechanics: every planar motion of a rigid body can be described by the motion of its centre of mass and a rotation about that centre.

JEE Main: high priority · JEE Advanced: medium priority · about 16 minutes

In 60 seconds

See this topic with animations, labs and questions.Open this topic

What you must already be able to do

You need Newton’s laws, free-body diagrams, work–energy, linear momentum, basic differentiation and integration, and the meaning of a vector cross product. If a derivative looks unfamiliar, read ω=dθ/dt as “angular position’s instantaneous rate of change.” If an integral looks unfamiliar, read ∫r2dm as “add the contribution r2Δm of every tiny mass element.” The calculus is bookkeeping for a physical idea.

A rigid body is an idealisation in which the distance between every pair of material points stays constant. The object may translate and rotate, but does not stretch or bend. A particle model discards orientation; a rigid-body model retains it. Use the latter when the location of a force, the distribution of mass, or the orientation of the body affects the answer.

For most of this chapter, the body moves in a plane and its rotation axis is perpendicular to that plane. Choose +x right, +y up and +z out of the page. Counterclockwise rotation is positive: 𝛚=ω𝐳^. An object rotating clockwise therefore has ω<0, even though its angular speed |ω| is positive. State this convention once and keep it.

The two vector operations you actually need

A dot product selects the component along a direction: 𝐀⋅𝐁=ABcos⁡ϕ. It produces a scalar and appears in work. A cross product measures a directed perpendicular effect: |𝐀×𝐁|=ABsin⁡ϕ. Its direction follows the right-hand rule. In a plane,

(𝐫×𝐅)z=xFy−yFx.

This one expression resolves many sign disputes. A rightward force applied above the origin produces a negative, clockwise moment because −yFx<0. A force pointing directly toward the origin gives zero moment because its line of action passes through the origin. A longer position vector is not automatically a longer lever arm: the lever arm is the perpendicular distance to the force’s line of action.

Why the centre of mass separates the motion

For masses mi at positions 𝐫i, define M=∑imi and

𝐫C=∑imi𝐫iM,𝐫i=𝐫C+𝛒i,∑imi𝛒i=𝟎.

Differentiating the final identity gives ∑imi𝐯i/C=𝟎. Thus the total momentum is 𝐏=M𝐯C: internal rotation contributes no net linear momentum. Summing Newton’s second law over all particles cancels the internal action–reaction forces, leaving

𝐅ext=M𝐚C.

The centre of mass consequently moves as a particle acted on by the resultant external force. But this equation does not determine how the body turns. A second piece of information—the external moment—is needed for orientation. A force can change both the centre-of-mass motion and the rotation, so “translation equation” and “rotation equation” must describe the same physical body.

For planar rigid motion, 𝐯i/C=𝛚×𝛒i. Expanding the kinetic energy gives

K=12∑imi|𝐯C+𝐯i/C|2=12MvC2+12ICω2,IC=∑imiρi,⊥2.

The cross term vanishes because ∑imi𝐯i/C=0. This is why translational and rotational kinetic energies add without double counting when the rotation term is taken about the centre of mass. Do not replace IC by an arbitrary moment of inertia while retaining 12MvC2.

The centre of mass need not lie inside the material

A ring’s centre of mass sits in empty space. It is still a valid reference point. For a continuous distribution, replace the discrete sum by 𝐫C=M−1∫𝐫dm. Symmetry can save this integration: the centre lies on every symmetry plane of a uniform body, and at the intersection when these planes determine a unique point. Symmetry of the outline alone is insufficient if density varies asymmetrically.

“Centre of mass” and “centre of gravity” coincide in a uniform gravitational field. Under that approximation, the distributed gravitational forces have the same resultant and moment as a single force M𝐠 applied at C. This is why a rigid body’s gravitational potential energy is MgyC, even while the body changes orientation. In a significantly nonuniform field, that shortcut requires reconsideration.

Worked example 01 · A nonuniform two-mass rotor

Problem. Particles of mass m and 3m are fixed to the ends of a massless rod of length L. Their coordinates along the rod are 0 and L. The assembly’s centre moves with speed V, and it rotates in its plane with angular speed ω. Find its centre of mass and kinetic energy.

Step 1: locate the centre. xC=(m⋅0+3mL)/(4m)=3L/4. The distances from the centre are 3L/4 and L/4, respectively. The centre lies closer to the heavier particle.

Step 2: calculate rotational inertia.

IC=m(3L4)2+3m(L4)2=34mL2.

Step 3: add the two energies.

K=2mV2+38mL2ω2.

Checks. Both terms have dimensions kgm2s−2. Setting ω=0 gives the energy of a translating mass 4m; setting V=0 gives pure rotation about the centre. The geometric midpoint would give the wrong rotational inertia.

Worked example 02 · Zero resultant force can still rotate a body

Problem. Two forces act on a plate: +F𝐱^ at (0,a), and −F𝐱^ at (0,−a). Find the resultant force and moment. Does shifting the reference origin change the answer?

Step 1: sum forces. 𝐅net=𝟎, so the centre of mass has zero acceleration from this pair.

Step 2: sum moments. The upper force contributes −aF, and the lower force also contributes −aF. Therefore τz=−2aF: a clockwise couple.

Step 3: shift the origin. If the new origin is displaced by 𝐛, then 𝛕′=∑(𝐫i−𝐛)×𝐅i=𝛕−𝐛×∑𝐅i=𝛕. A pure couple has the same moment about every origin.

Checks. The moment has units Nm; it vanishes as the force separation 2a vanishes. Zero resultant force does not imply zero angular acceleration. Also, zero acceleration of the centre does not imply zero centre velocity.

Beyond JEE: when scalar rotation is not enough

The scope boundary: scalar rotation is not all of three-dimensional mechanics

For fixed-axis rotation, the angular-momentum component along that axis is Laxis=Iaxisω. For a planar lamina rotating normally to its plane through its centre, the full rotational angular momentum is parallel to 𝛚. For a general three-dimensional body about an arbitrary axis, 𝐋 need not be parallel to 𝛚; the full relation uses an inertia tensor. Do not silently promote every scalar formula here to a universal vector identity.

Checkpoint · Can a body have zero total linear momentum and nonzero kinetic energy?

Yes. A body spinning about a stationary centre of mass has 𝐏=M𝐯C=0, but K=12ICω2>0. The particles’ momenta cancel as vectors; their positive kinetic energies do not.

Centre-of-mass toolkit

JEE Main lists centre of mass inside the rotation unit, and it is asked directly. Two methods cover nearly every question: the table below, and treating a hole as negative mass.

Uniform bodyCentreMeasured from
Semicircular wire, radius R2R/πCentre of curvature
Semicircular plate4R/3πStraight edge
Circular arc of half-angle αRsin⁡α/αCentre of curvature
Solid hemisphere3R/8Flat face
Hollow hemisphereR/2Open rim plane
Solid coneh/4Base
Hollow cone (no base)h/3Base plane
Triangular plateh/3Base

Removal method. Treat a cut-out as negative mass at its own centre:

xC=M1x1−m2x2M1−m2.
The centre always moves away from the hole.

Motion of the centre. Internal forces cannot move it. In an explosion, or when people walk on a boat, v→C stays fixed unless an external force acts.